WHY DID TIME MAG's MARK HALPERIN OMIT HERMAN CAIN FROM REVIEW ? RACIST ?
"... Their omission of Mr. Cain is liberal racial prejudice against a conservative candidate. It's political ideological bigotry and is BS, but it isn't motivated by the belief that blacks are inherently inferior to Caucasian (?) candidates. They're ideological bigots. They believe that true black politician have to be a liberal. It's foolish to feed the liberal idiocy by perpetuating the misuse of "racism" as a word. You can't get past their misuse of that term if you institutionalize the misuse yourself ....#4 Agreed Submitted by GregE on Sat, 06/04/2011 - 9:56pm .... It's not racist. What it is is making the claim, as you say, that anyone of the black race must be liberal, period Anything else is unacceptable....
[Reader comment] "... I made a similar remarak on the previous article about this. The word"racism" is getting thrown around too much lately and people have forgotten what it truly means to be racist. The media isn't ignoring Cain because he's black, they're ignoring him because he's a black Republican, and even then that's an assumption. We need to be careful about presuming to know the intentions of others, something the MSM is more than happy to do.----- "
http://m.newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2011/06/04/additional-reasons-why-mark-halperins-omissions-herman-cain-time-are-ine
Monday, June 6, 2011
6/6/11 WHY DID TIME MAG's MARK HALPERIN OMIT HERMAN CAIN FROM REVIEW (twice) ?
